The world is under real pressure to deal with rising carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels. Burning fossil fuels for power, industry and transport releases huge amounts of CO₂ into the atmosphere, and this gas is one of the main drivers of global warming. Cutting emissions at the source is essential, but for many existing plants and processes we also need smart ways to capture CO₂ before it reaches the air.

Over the last two decades, one family of materials has become a sort of “rising star” in this field: metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Within that family, a particular material called ZIF-8 (zeolitic imidazolate framework-8) is especially interesting. It combines high porosity, chemical stability and tunable structure with relatively simple synthesis – all of which are very attractive for CO₂ capture technologies.

In this article, we’ll walk through:

• Why CO₂ capture is such a big topic

• How current industrial capture technologies work

• What makes MOFs – and especially ZIF-8 – valuable for CO₂ separation

• The main synthesis routes for ZIF-8 and how they affect properties

• How particle size, structure and porosity influence CO₂ adsorption

• The role of ZIF-8 in membranes and composite filters

• Key challenges and future directions for scaling ZIF-8 based CO₂ capture

The goal is a clear, technical but readable overview you could comfortably put on a company or research blog.

---

1. Why CO₂ Capture Matters – and How Industry Does It Today

CO₂ is the most discussed greenhouse gas because:

• Its concentration has increased by roughly 100 ppm over the last several decades,

• It stays in the atmosphere for a long time, and

• It comes directly from essential activities like power generation, steel, cement, chemicals and transport.

To control emissions, we need two things:

1. Cleaner processes and energy sources, and

2. Technologies that can capture and separate CO₂ from gas streams such as flue gas or syngas.

1.1. Main industrial CO₂ capture concepts

In thermal power plants and large industrial facilities, three general process concepts are used:

• Post-combustion capture
  Fuel is burned in air as usual, producing flue gas (mainly N₂, CO₂, water, some O₂). CO₂ is then separated from this gas using solvents or solid adsorbents. This is the most “retrofit-friendly” approach.

• Pre-combustion capture
  Fuel is first converted (with steam and oxygen) into a mixture of CO₂ and H₂. CO₂ is removed at higher pressure using solvents or solids, leaving hydrogen as a cleaner fuel. This concept is common in gasification and IGCC-type systems.

• Oxy-fuel (oxy-combustion)
  Fuel is burned in almost pure oxygen instead of air. The flue gas is mostly CO₂ and water, so after condensation of water you have a CO₂-rich stream that is easier to purify.

1.2. Classic capture technologies – and their limits

Several technologies are already used or tested in industry:

• Amine scrubbing (chemical absorption)
  Aqueous amine solvents (like MEA) chemically bind CO₂ and are later regenerated with heat.

  • ✅ Mature, high selectivity

  • ❌ High energy penalty for regeneration, solvent degradation, corrosion problems

• Pressure swing adsorption (PSA)
  CO₂ is adsorbed on a solid at higher pressure and released at lower pressure.

  • ✅ Lower energy than many solvent systems, modular

  • ❌ Adsorbent aging, higher capital cost, complex multi-bed operation

• Temperature swing adsorption (TSA)
  Similar principle, but regeneration is done by heating instead of pressure changes.

  • ✅ Flexible adsorbent choice

  • ❌ Heat management and scale-up can be tricky

• Solid sorbents (like MOFs, activated carbons, zeolites)
  These are attractive because they can be tailored for high capacity and selectivity, and they avoid corrosion and solvent losses. But:

  • ❌ Stability, cost, and scale-up are key questions

• Membrane separation
  Gas mixtures are separated based on different permeation rates through a membrane.

  • ✅ Continuous operation, compact, potentially energy-efficient

  • ❌ Trade-off between permeability and selectivity, durability issues for real flue gas

• Cryogenic separation, ionic liquids, SILMs, etc.
  These are more niche or still under development, often with higher complexity or energy requirements.

All of these methods work to some extent, but none of them is perfect. That’s why researchers look for new materials that:

• Capture more CO₂ per unit mass or volume

• Are easy to regenerate

• Are stable in moisture and impurities

• Can be produced at low cost and large scale

This is where MOFs – and ZIF-8 in particular – become very relevant.

---

2. From MOFs to ZIF-8: Why This Framework Is So Popular

2.1. What are MOFs?

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline, porous materials. They are made of:

• Metal ions or clusters (e.g. Zn²⁺, Zr⁴⁺, Cu²⁺, etc.)

• Organic linkers (often carboxylates or nitrogen-containing ligands)

The metal nodes and linkers assemble into 2D or 3D networks with well-defined pores. Because you can change both the metal and the linker, MOFs are extremely tunable in terms of:

• Pore size and shape

• Chemical functionality inside the pores

• Stability (thermal, chemical, mechanical)

This tunability makes them attractive for gas storage, separation, catalysis, sensing and even biomedical uses.

2.2. What are ZIFs and ZIF-8?

Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) are a sub-family of MOFs. They combine:

• Transition metals (often Zn²⁺ or Co²⁺)

• Imidazolate linkers, which are nitrogen-containing heterocycles

The metal–imidazolate–metal angle (~145°) leads to structures similar to zeolites, hence the name. ZIFs are known for:

• High surface area

• Tunable pore sizes

• Excellent chemical and thermal stability

ZIF-8 is one of the most studied ZIFs. It typically consists of:

• Zn²⁺ ions

• The organic linker 2-methylimidazole (2-mIm)

The resulting framework forms cavities around ~1.1–1.2 nm connected by narrow windows (~0.34 nm). This gives ZIF-8:

• A high specific surface area (commonly over 1000 m²/g)

• A microporous structure suitable for small gas molecules (CO₂, N₂, CH₄, H₂)

• Good stability in many organic solvents and even in hot water or basic solutions

For CO₂ capture, ZIF-8 offers:

• Moderate but useful CO₂ uptake at ambient conditions

• Good CO₂/N₂ and CO₂/CH₄ separation potential

• Suitability for membranes and composite filters

• Relatively simple and versatile synthesis routes

However, ZIF-8 performance is highly dependent on how it is made. Particle size, morphology, surface area and pore structure all depend strongly on the synthesis method – and that, in turn, strongly affects CO₂ adsorption, permeability and selectivity.

---

3. Main Synthesis Routes for ZIF-8

ZIF-8 can be synthesized by a surprisingly wide range of methods. Each route offers its own advantages, limitations and “typical” particle characteristics. Here we’ll go through the key ones.

3.1. Solvothermal synthesis

This is one of the most classic and widely used methods.

• Basic idea:
  Metal salt (e.g. zinc nitrate) and 2-methylimidazole are dissolved in an organic solvent (often DMF or methanol), then heated in a closed vessel for several hours.

• Typical conditions:
  Temperatures around 120–140 °C, reaction times on the order of 24 h.

• Pros:

  • Produces highly crystalline ZIF-8

  • Well-defined polyhedral crystals

  • Suitable for relatively large-scale batches

• Cons:

  • Can generate larger particles (micron scale) and sometimes macro-crystals

  • Uses organic solvents and long reaction times

  • Not the “greenest” route

Solvothermal ZIF-8 typically has high crystallinity and good structural order, which is beneficial for stability and reproducible gas adsorption. However, the larger particle size can be less ideal for some membrane or composite applications where nanoscale ZIF-8 disperses more effectively.

3.2. Hydrothermal synthesis

Hydrothermal synthesis is conceptually similar to solvothermal, but uses water as the main solvent.

• Pros:

  • More eco-friendly and lower solvent cost

  • Can give smaller particles (typically in the 100–150 nm range)

  • Still achieves high crystallinity and decent surface area

• Cons:

  • Reaction times can still be relatively long

  • Some control parameters (like surfactant content or pH) must be tuned carefully

Hydrothermal ZIF-8 often shows hexagonal or cubic-like crystals with good porosity and surface area suitable for CO₂ capture. Because it can yield smaller particles, it’s attractive for preparing filters or mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) where ZIF-8 needs to be well dispersed.

3.3. Microwave-assisted synthesis

Microwave heating can dramatically speed up ZIF-8 formation.

• Basic idea:
  The reaction mixture (e.g. zinc nitrate + 2-mIm in DMF) is heated using microwave radiation instead of conventional convection.

• Pros:

  • Much shorter reaction times (few hours or less)

  • Often considered more energy-efficient

  • Can produce uniform particles with good crystallinity

• Cons:

  • Controlling temperature and local heating can be challenging

  • Often leads to larger particles than some other fast routes

  • Industrial scale-up requires specialized equipment

Microwave-assisted ZIF-8 typically has good surface area and defined morphology, with crystal sizes in the ~100–300 nm range depending on conditions. CO₂ uptake can be respectable, but may be somewhat lower than materials optimized specifically for maximum surface area and pore volume.

3.4. Sonochemical synthesis

In sonochemical synthesis, intense ultrasound is applied to the reaction mixture.

• What ultrasound does:
  It creates local hot spots and high-energy microenvironments through acoustic cavitation, which can accelerate nucleation and growth.

• Pros:

  • Fast synthesis compared to traditional routes

  • Often yields smaller particles and narrower size distributions

  • Attractive for scaling up if reactors are well designed

• Cons:

  • Requires dedicated sonochemical equipment

  • Reaction parameters (power, time, temperature, pH) must be carefully controlled

  • At some conditions, particles can still become relatively large (hundreds of nm)

Sonochemical ZIF-8 can show high surface areas and significant pore volumes. However, particle size and morphology can be very sensitive to pH and process settings, so reproducibility needs attention.

3.5. Mechanochemical (solvent-free) synthesis

Mechanochemical synthesis uses mechanical energy (grinding, milling) to drive reactions, often without solvent.

• Typical procedure:
  A metal source (e.g. ZnO or zinc salt) and the imidazolate linker are ground together (sometimes with a small additive) in a ball mill.

• Pros:

  • Little or no solvent → greener and cheaper

  • Short reaction times (minutes to an hour)

  • Potentially very scalable and continuous

  • Produces nano-MOFs or compact powders suitable for shaping

• Cons:

  • Particle size distribution can be broad

  • Reproducibility depends on milling conditions (frequency, time, ball size)

  • Structural metrics (pore size, crystallinity) need careful control

Mechanochemically produced ZIF-8 can adopt rhombic dodecahedral or plate-like morphologies. CO₂ uptake can be lower than for highly optimized solvothermal or hydrothermal materials, but the green, scalable nature of this route makes it very attractive for future industrial use.

3.6. Dry-gel conversion (DGC)

Dry-gel conversion is somewhere between solvothermal and mechanochemical.

• Concept:
  A mostly dry mixture of precursors is placed above a small amount of solvent in a sealed autoclave. The solvent vapor (rather than bulk liquid) drives crystallization.

• Pros:

  • Uses much less solvent than solvothermal routes

  • Solvent can often be recovered and reused

  • Can achieve high yields and good crystallinity

• Cons:

  • Temperature and vapor environment must be carefully controlled

  • Scaling up the reactor design is non-trivial

DGC is attractive when you need to balance environmental impact, cost and material quality.

3.7. Microfluidic synthesis

Microfluidic methods use continuous-flow microreactors where reactant solutions are mixed in small channels or droplets.

• Pros:

  • Very good control of nucleation and growth → narrow particle size distributions

  • Continuous processing, not batch

  • Scalable via “numbering-up” of microreactors

• Cons:

  • Lower throughput per reactor → needs parallelization

  • Setup is more complex than a simple batch reactor

  • Often uses oil phases and droplet formation, which adds processing steps

Microfluidic ZIF-8 can be tailored in size and morphology quite precisely, which is very helpful for high-performance membranes or advanced composites.

3.8. Rapid room-temperature synthesis

One particularly attractive route is rapid synthesis in water at room temperature.

• Basic idea:
  Metal salt and 2-mIm are dissolved in water, mixed quickly, and allowed to react for a short time (minutes to tens of minutes). By adjusting factors such as pH and mixing time, you can tune particle size.

• Pros:

  • No organic solvent, no heating → very eco-friendly

  • Extremely fast (minutes)

  • Particle size can be tuned down to tens of nanometers

  • Simple equipment

• Cons:

  • Still needs extensive optimization for industrial scale

  • Careful control of mixing and pH is needed for reproducibility

This rapid route is one of the most promising options for future large-scale ZIF-8 production, especially for CO₂ capture, because it combines green chemistry, low cost and tunable morphology.

---

4. How Synthesis Affects CO₂ Capture Performance

Different synthesis routes don’t just change how ZIF-8 is made – they change what ZIF-8 actually is, in terms of its usable properties. Several key factors determine how well ZIF-8 can capture CO₂.

4.1. Particle size and dispersion

• Smaller ZIF-8 particles (e.g. 50–150 nm) are generally easier to disperse in polymers to form mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs).

• When ZIF-8 is well dispersed, it can:

  • Increase CO₂ permeability

  • Enhance CO₂ selectivity over gases like CH₄ or N₂

  • Provide more accessible surface area and pores

For example, adding nanoscale ZIF-8 to polymers like PIM-1 or PBI can significantly boost CO₂ permeability and improve CO₂/CH₄ selectivity, provided the filler is uniformly distributed and there are no large agglomerates.

On the other hand, too large particles or poor dispersion can create defects or non-selective voids, which worsen membrane performance.

4.2. Structure, surface area and functionalization

ZIF-8 is already highly porous, but structure and surface chemistry can be further tuned:

• Higher surface area and micropore volume usually mean higher CO₂ uptake (up to a point).

• Modifying linkers or post-synthetic treatments (like solvent-assisted ligand exchange) can:

  • Introduce more CO₂-philic sites

  • Increase CO₂ uptake at a given temperature and pressure

• Alternative ZIF structures, such as leaf-like ZIF-L with cushion-shaped cavities, can show significantly higher CO₂ adsorption than standard ZIF-8, even at lower surface areas, due to differences in pore shape and density.

In other words, it’s not only “how porous” the material is, but how the pores are shaped and functionalized.

4.3. Porosity and mechanical stability

For CO₂ capture, an ideal adsorbent should combine:

• High micropore volume and accessible surface area

• Stable pore structure under repeated adsorption–desorption cycles

• Good mechanical strength (especially in shaped bodies, pellets or monoliths)

Synthesis conditions directly influence:

• The BET surface area

• The pore size distribution

• The mechanical robustness of the crystals or composite structures

For example, some sonochemical or microwave routes can give high surface area but require careful process tuning to maintain mechanical integrity and avoid over-fragile crystals.

4.4. Cost, scalability and reproducibility

From a commercial point of view, the best synthesis route is not just the one that gives the highest CO₂ uptake in the lab.

It must also:

• Use low-cost, safe solvents (ideally water)

• Minimize energy consumption (low temperatures, short reaction times)

• Be scalable and reproducible from gram to kilogram and eventually tonne scale

This is why routes such as:

• Mechanochemical (solvent-free) synthesis

• Rapid aqueous synthesis at room temperature

• Continuous-flow and spray-drying processes

receive so much attention. They aim to bring ZIF-8 out of the lab and into real industrial systems.

---

5. ZIF-8 in Membranes, Filters and Composites for CO₂ Capture

ZIF-8 on its own is usually a fine powder. For real processes, it needs to be shaped or integrated into larger structures.

Typical strategies include:

• Mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs)
  ZIF-8 particles are embedded in a polymer (e.g. PIM-1, PBI, polysulfone, polyimide).
  When optimized, these MMMs can show:

  • Higher CO₂ permeability

  • Higher or at least preserved selectivity (CO₂/N₂, CO₂/CH₄)

  • Better mechanical properties than pure MOF membranes

• ZIF-8 on fibers or porous substrates
  For example, ZIF-8 grown on cellulose fibers, alumina hollow fibers or polymer supports can form thin, highly active layers for gas separation.

• ZIF-8 in aerogels and porous monoliths
  Combining ZIF-8 with carbon aerogels or other supports can produce lightweight, highly porous sorbents with improved CO₂ capacity and faster diffusion.

In all these configurations, the quality of the ZIF-8 (size, morphology, surface chemistry) is directly tied to the synthesis method. A membrane that performs extremely well often uses ZIF-8 produced under carefully engineered conditions.

---

6. Challenges and Future Directions

ZIF-8 is already a very promising material, but there are still important challenges before it becomes a mainstream industrial CO₂ sorbent.

6.1. Real flue gas conditions

Industrial streams are not just CO₂ and N₂. They also contain:

• Water vapor (humidity)

• O₂

• Acidic gases like SO₂ and NOx

• Other contaminants

These can:

• Compete with CO₂ for adsorption sites

• Affect the stability and structure of ZIF-8 over time

• Change selectivity and capacity

ZIF-8 is relatively stable, but long-term tests under realistic flue gas conditions are essential. Surface functionalization and composite design can help improve tolerance to moisture and impurities.

6.2. Processability and shaping

Powder ZIF-8 is not ideal for packed columns or industrial sorption beds. It needs to be shaped into:

• Pellets or granules

• Monoliths

• Structured sorbents

• Robust MMMs or laminates

Shaping must preserve:

• High accessible surface area

• Good gas diffusion paths

• Mechanical robustness over many cycles

Binder choice, forming method and thermal treatment all matter. A lot of current work focuses on binder-free shaping, hybrid MOF–polymer structures, and 3D-printed MOF architectures.

6.3. Large-scale, green synthesis

For tonne-scale production, future ZIF-8 synthesis will likely rely on:

• Water-based or solvent-free methods

• Continuous processes (e.g. flow reactors, spray drying)

• Energy-efficient heating (or no heating at all)

• Low-cost precursors, possibly including bio-derived linkers

Mechanochemical routes, rapid aqueous synthesis and microfluidic or spray-based techniques are all pieces of this puzzle. The target is a process that is:

• Economically competitive

• Environmentally acceptable

• Capable of delivering consistent quality at large volumes

---

7. Conclusion

ZIF-8 sits at a very interesting intersection:

• It’s chemically and thermally robust, which many MOFs are not.

• It has high porosity and tunable pore structure, ideal for gas separation.

• It can be synthesized by many different routes, from classic solvothermal to green mechanochemical methods.

• It integrates well into membranes, filters, aerogels and composites designed for CO₂ capture.

At the same time, its actual performance – capacity, selectivity, stability, cost – depends critically on how it is made and how it is processed. Particle size, morphology, pore structure, surface chemistry and scalability are all set, or at least strongly influenced, by the synthesis route.

Looking ahead, the most promising direction is not just “more ZIF-8”, but better engineered ZIF-8:

• Produced via green, scalable methods like rapid aqueous or mechanochemical synthesis

• Optimized in particle size and structure for membranes or sorbent beds

• Combined with polymers, supports or other MOFs to improve stability and selectivity in real flue gas

• Shaped into industrial-grade forms – pellets, monoliths, MMMs, aerogels – that can be used in PSA/TSA/VSA or membrane modules

If those pieces come together, ZIF-8 and related frameworks can move from “interesting materials in the lab” to core components of practical CO₂ capture systems, helping to decarbonize industry in a more efficient and sustainable way.